767 Vs 787, What One Digit And 30 Years Mean? - Airliners.net
Sep 27, 2011 · The 762 and 763 are smaller than any 787, and the 787-9 and 787-10 will be bigger than any 767. And in general, the ideal mission profiles of the 767 and 787 are rather different. The 787 is better suited for longer, denser routes.
767 Vs. 787 - Airliners.net
Feb 19, 2005 · The 767 was a great seller until the A330 came around. Then the 767's cargo capacity (or lack thereof) crippled it. The 787 is a long overdue replacement, not update, for the 767 line. It also offers very high fuel savings over the 767, a more comfortable cabin, more cargo room (better than the A330), and commonality with the 777.
787 Vs 767 And 757 - Airliners.net
Nov 5, 2006 · When comparing the 787 to the 767, the 787-3, seeming to be an A330 competitor, is actually quite similar to the 767. The 767-400ER, is the 787 of comercial service today, without a doubt, the 787 will retire this (the aircraft are too similar). The main difference between the two aircraft is the range and capacity characteristics.
777 Vs. 787 Tailcone Shape - Airliners.net
Jun 26, 2007 · That's not the case...if you followed on the planning and design of the 787, the 767 style tailcone is used to reduce ramp noise. The engineers wanted the benefit of improved aerodynamics with the 777 tail but had to go with the 767 in order to reduce ramp noise. It's a …
Economics Of The 787-8 Vs 767-300ER - Airliners.net
Jun 14, 2006 · The unit acquisition cost are supposed to be lower; the aircraft is 20% more fuel efficient; I believe maintnance costs will be lower- albeit probably more labor intensive (just guessing here from mine limited experience with composites) and, if you are the first to use the 787 on the JFK-GIG route, you will be able to cash-in a whole lot more than your competitors …
Airbus 330 Vs Boeing 767? - Airliners.net
Mar 3, 2005 · They are, however, smaller still. It all depends on what you need. The 787 will replace the 767 and remedy its faults while improving on its strengths. It will have a wider cabin, allowing for even more cargo capacity than the A330 while burning 20% less fuel than the equivilent 767. Also, it will have 2000-3000nm more range than either airplane.
767-300 Vs 787-8 250 Passengers - Airliners.net
Sep 3, 2014 · The 787 will burn about 21% less fuel on a similar leg when compared to the 767. ANA has reported like for like comparisons between the two aircraft. The weight savings come from a broad range of improvements from the engines (better SFC), no bleed air for pressurization, lower empty weight and lower coefficient of drag.
United 787-9 Vs 777-200ER - Airliners.net
Aug 19, 2013 · The 787-9 will have similar (a bit lower) seat count to the 777 and has lower operating costs. However the 777 is still lower than the 767 which is the plane that needs to go. UA has not replaced planes one for one in regards to capacity. The 767-200s were replaced with 767-300s (capacity gain).
767, 787, 777 Size Comparison - Airliners.net
Jul 29, 2007 · This is a 777-300ER, 787-8, and 767-300. I tried doing it with more aircraft on the same page but it started getting too cluttered way to quickly. You can clearly see, just from these three models, that the 767-300 and 787-8 fuselages are very close, but the wing and engines are far larger. Tom.
Fuel consumption A350 vs 787 - Airliners.net
Sep 11, 2018 · I real world exmple of this is Singapore to Los Angeles. The difference between the A350-900 vs 787-9 can be clearly shown as it is well past this maximum range point of the 787-9 The A350-900 can perform the route on a bad day with a full passenger load. The 787-9 has to block many rows of seats on a bad day and the route was cancelled as a ...